Legal Opinion

People v. Grinnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1908No. Crim. No. 102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with the offense defined in section 288 of the Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment and an order «denying his motion for a new trial.

At the trial the defendant interposed an objection to the introduction of evidence upon the ground that the facts stated in the indictment did not constitute a public offense, which objection was overruled. Said section 288 is as follows:

“Any person who shall willfully and lewdly commit any lewd or lascivious act other than the acts constituting other crimes provided for in part two of this code upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AbbeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  2. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. State v. KernanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. People v. H. Jevne Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API