Legal Opinion
Klein v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1937No. 27471PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to as petitioner and respondent.
On the 28th day of August, 1936, the State Industrial Commission denied the petitioner an award for an injury received while he was engaged in manual labor on the premises owned by the Braniff Investment Company in Tulsa, Okla. Petitioner testified that the Braniff Investment Company had charge of several different properties, and that his employment was that of landscaping and tree surgery. On the 22nd day of January, 1936, he was employed by the Braniff Investment Company by their Mr. Parks to cut down a tree at 109 South Utica…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Mobley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hardy Sanitarium v. DehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rider v. Bob Hiner Service StationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. StrangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- City of Tulsa v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- City of Tulsa v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.