Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1941No. 29154PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court brought by the city of Tulsa, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, and its insurance carrier to obtain a review of an award based upon a finding of change in condition and which was made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of Tom Hughes, hereinafter referred to as respondent. The respondent, by cross-petition, seeks an increase in the amount of the award.
The record shows that on January 22, 1932, the respondent, while in the employ of the petitioner as a laborer in its park department, sprained his back while loading concrete in a truck;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hardy Sanitarium v. DehartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Duncan v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cooper v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Rhoton v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Oklahoma City Livestock Exchange v. ParkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- City of Tulsa v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Richey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.