Legal Opinion
Perkins v. New Jersey Department of Labor
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 11, 1994No. 94-CV-1087PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This matter arises from the filing of plaintiffs pro se complaint on February 16, 1994 alleging claims against the New Jersey Department of Labor—Workers Compensation Division (“NJDOL”). The handwritten complaint, which alleges that various attorneys and workers compensation judges deprived plaintiff of his rights, fails to set forth any legal basis for plaintiffs claims. This Court ordered plaintiff to appear at a hearing on April 6, 1994, to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (court can…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States ex rel. Walker v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Lynch v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance UnderwritingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. Systonetics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- KINLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY v. KramerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
- ARCHIE v. SMITHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- HAGER v. YOUNGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- RANSOM v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- RANSOM v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.