Legal Opinion

RANSOM v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 8, 2021No. 1:20-cv-12932Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANTHONY A. RANSOM, 1:20-cv-12932-NLH-AMD Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM v. OPINION & ORDER UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and WILLIAM CLARK, Defendants. APPEARANCES: ANTHONY A. RANSOM 3001 ROUTE 130 APT. 36K DELRAN, NJ 08075 Appearing pro se HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Anthony A. Ransom, appearing pro se, has filed a complaint against Defendants “United States Federal Government” and William Clark; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff claims that he was implanted with microchips so his family and Defendant William Clark could monitor him; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Perkins v. New Jersey Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API