Legal Opinion
Lynch v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-6289PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached an automobile insurance agreement by refusing to pay a claim which arose from an accident in Philadelphia. Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2).
I. BACKGROUND
On March 19, 1988, plaintiff purchased an automobile insurance policy from the defendant New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association (commonly known as the JUA) through a servicing carrier, Hanover Insurance Company. At the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bahn v. Chicago Motor Club InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Rose v. Granite City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Perkins v. New Jersey Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- John Hancock Property & Casualty Co. v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- McMullen v. European Adoption Consultants, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.