Legal Opinion
KINLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY v. Kramer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 2, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
256 N.J. Super. 355 (1992)
606 A.2d 1163
KINLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
HYMAN & ADELE KRAMER, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided April 2, 1992.
Russell H. Hulsizer, for plaintiff.
Hyman & Adele Kramer, pro se defendants.
MATHIAS E. RODRIGUEZ, J.S.C.
Defendant, Hyman Kramer ("Kramer"), suffered a work-related injury while working for his employer, Sylvan Piping. Because of this injury, on August 18, 1989, defendant filed workers' compensation claim number XX-XXXXXX. At present, that claim is still pending final decision by the Workers'…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. StephensonTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- De Asio v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Benson v. Coca Cola Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Ellis Hospital v. Symonds, New York County Courts1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. ChristodoulouSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC v. HawrylukNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- West Jersey Health System v. CronebergerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Perkins v. New Jersey Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994