Legal Opinion

In Re GRAND JURY

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 11, 2009No. 08-1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from an ongoing grand jury investigation. The appellant, a non-target, testified before the grand jury concerning highly technical and ancient subject matter. After approximately three hours of testimony, during which the government reminded the appellant repeatedly that a failure to testify truthfully would be subject to possible perjury charges, the government continued its examination to a later date. In the interim, the appellant sought access to a transcript of his prior testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(i).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. John Doe, Inc. ISupreme Court of the United States · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Justice McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. (PC) Rayford v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Rayford v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (PC) Sekona v. PerezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. (PC) Sekona v. PerezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API