(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 13 v. RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 SHERMAN, et al., BE GRANTED (ECF No. 44.) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19 Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s 21 Second Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.