(PC) Sekona v. Perez
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-JLT-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 v. PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROTECT CLAIMS AGAINST 14 R. PEREZ, et al., DEFENDANTS PEREZ, MUNOZ, SIMS, AND MALDONADO, AND THAT ALL OTHER 15 Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 16 CLAIM (ECF No. 32.) 17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 18 FOURTEEN DAYS 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.