Legal Opinion

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00400Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-NONE-GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR 13 v. VIOLATION OF RULE 8 AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER § 14 R. PEREZ, et al., 1983, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT EXCEEDING 25 PAGES 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API