Legal Opinion
In re Snow
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 26, 1973No. Patent No. 8785PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-16 in appellants’ application serial No. 577,820, filed September 8, 1966, as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the prior art. We affirm.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a herbieidal composition comprising a N,N-disubstituted-c(,«-diphenylacetamide (hereinafter Diphenamid) and 4,6-dinitro-o-sec.butyl-phenol (hereinafter DNBP) dissolved in a chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent, and a method of using that composition to control weeds. As…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Hans Theodor BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Wilbur F. Chapman and John N. CosbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Alan J. Lemin, Arnolds Steinhards and George SwankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re BodeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re KohlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973