Legal Opinion
In re Bode
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 24, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 76-644PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1-8,1 all of the claims in application serial No. 314,655, filed December 13, 1972, for “Gaseous Display /Memory Device.”2 We affirm.
The Invention
The invention relates to gaseous discharge display devices having an electrical memory and the capability of producing a visual display, as shown by appellants’ drawings below:3
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
As illustrated, the device comprises a continuous uniform layer of ionizable gas (12)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re WigginsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- In re deC. KratzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In re NolanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981