Legal Opinion

Application of Wilbur F. Chapman and John N. Cosby

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 17, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7412PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of product claims 1 to 4 and process claims 5, 6 and 8 in application serial No. 819,106, filed June 9, 1959, for “High Strength Chlorinated Polyethylenes and Process for Preparing Them.” No claim is allowed.

Appellants invented improvements in the art of chlorinating polyethylenes. Their application points out that while it is known to chlorinate polyethylenes having a wide variety of structures and molecular weights to obtain resins useful in many applications, such prior art…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Arthur D. Lohr and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Gustav Widmer, Hans Batzer and Edwin NiklesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Application of Herman HoeksemaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. In re MerchantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. In re MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Application of Fritz UhligCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API