Legal Opinion

Gill v. Ozark Forest Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1974No. 73-256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant’s husband was accidentally killed during the scope of his employment with appellee Ozark Forest Products, Inc. Admittedly, the claim is compensable. The appellee insurance carrier began paying appellant widow $>22.38 per week and the balance of the benefits was paid to the six minor children of the deceased by a previous marriage. On appeal the widow contends that the commission, affirmed by the circuit court, should have awarded her a greater weekly sum and, further, she was entitled to a lump sum settlement which the commission denied. We first consider…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Michael Hospital v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Mack Coal Company v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Lexington Mining Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ryan v. NapaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Wright v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Travelers Insurance v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Metro Temporaries v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API