Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 14, 1941No. 29999PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an appeal by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company from an order of the Corporation Commission denying its petition to discontinue the services of a regular station agent at Ripley and substitute therefor a caretaker or merchant agent.
The commission’s jurisdiction in such case is conferred by section 18, art. 9, of the Constitution. By the provisions thereof, relating to transportation and transmission companies, the commission “shall require them to establish and maintain all such public service, facilities, and conveniences as may be reasonable and just. . . .” And…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Lowden v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- In Re Intrastate Express RatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arizona Corporation Com'n v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Thomson v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomson v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Missouri Pacific Rld. Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.