Legal Opinion

Lowden v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1938No. 27823PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, Y. C. J.

Frank O. Lowden and others, trustees for the estate of the Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Company, a corporation, applied to the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma for permission to discontinue the regular station agent for the company at Lima, Okla. Notice was given, and, after a hearing, the Corporation Commission refused to grant the application. The company appeals.

The application reads:

“Frank 0. Lowden * * * make application for authority and permission to discontinue the regular station agent at Lima, Oklahoma, and respectfully show:
“Authority and permission to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomson v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Lowden v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Lowden v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Lowden v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API