Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Newell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1910No. 1031PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Corporation Commission.' Action by the State and J. Q. Newell against .the St. Louis & San Francisco Bailroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Citing: A., T. .& S. F. Ry. Co. v. State, 33 Oída. 231, and C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State, 24 Okla. 370.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This appeal is from an order of the Corporation Commission, ordering appellant to establish and maintain telegraph service at the town of Jennings on its line of railway, and. that all passenger trains be bulletined as heretofore ordered by the Commission. The order further directs appellant to repair and put in a serviceable condition a switch track at said station. No objection to this last provision of the-order has been urged by appellant, and our consideration, therefore, will be directed to that portion of the order which requires appellant to establish telegraph service and to bulletin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seward v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kurn v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Southwestern Light & Power Co. v. City of ElkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API