Legal Opinion

State v. Sarkozy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2008No. 2006-1973PublishedCited by 365 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

*87I. Introduction

{¶ 1} Today this court must determine the effect of the failure of a trial court during a plea colloquy to advise a defendant that his sentence includes a mandatory term of postrelease control. Because we hold that a defendant in these circumstances may challenge whether the plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary either by filing a motion to withdraw the plea or upon direct appeal, we vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause.

II. Facts

{¶ 2} On February 8, 2005, Michael Sarkozy, defendant-appellant, was indicted on ten counts, including one count of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by365 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. BlackburnOhio Supreme Court · 2008

360 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API