State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
*156{¶ 1} We are asked to resolve a certified conflict between judgments of the Second District Court of Appeals and the Fifth and Eighth District Courts of Appeals on the question "[w]hether a criminal defendant on [postrelease control] for a prior felony must be advised, during his plea hearing in a new felony case, of the trial court's ability under R.C. 2929.141 to terminate his existing [postrelease control] and to impose a consecutive prison sentence for the [postrelease-control] violation." 152 Ohio St.3d 1404, 2018-Ohio-723, 92 N.E.3d 877. We conclude that Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) requires…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. WillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.