Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2018No. 2017-1715 and 2017-1716PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

*156{¶ 1} We are asked to resolve a certified conflict between judgments of the Second District Court of Appeals and the Fifth and Eighth District Courts of Appeals on the question "[w]hether a criminal defendant on [postrelease control] for a prior felony must be advised, during his plea hearing in a new felony case, of the trial court's ability under R.C. 2929.141 to terminate his existing [postrelease control] and to impose a consecutive prison sentence for the [postrelease-control] violation." 152 Ohio St.3d 1404, 2018-Ohio-723, 92 N.E.3d 877. We conclude that Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) requires…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. WillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API