Legal Opinion

State v. Blackburn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2008No. 2007-0519PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} We must determine whether the periods of delay resulting from motions filed by a criminal defendant in a previous case also apply when calculating the time within which the defendant must be brought to trial in a subsequent case in which there are different charges based on the same underlying facts and circumstances of the previous case.

{¶ 2} The state is appealing the dismissal of criminal charges against the defendant-appellee, Kenneth Blackburn, for its failure to bring the case to trial within 270 days, as required by R.C. 2945.71(C)(2). This is the third case in which charges have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. CottrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. DahmsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. RedelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API