Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1987No. 84-1383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial of appellant’s motion to reduce his sentence, or, in the alternative, to correct an illegal sentence. See D.C.Code § 23-110 (1981); Super.Ct.Crim.R. 35(a). Appellant contends that by ordering him to pay restitution to victims of crimes for which he was not convicted, the trial court exceeded its authority under the District of Columbia’s restitution statute, D.C.Code § 16-711 (1986 Supp.). We decide only that, where, as here, a defendant consents to compensation to victims of crimes for which he was indicted but not convicted, and consents to the specific terms…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Garski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sloan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Basile v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Belay v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Goings v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API