Legal Opinion

Goings v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 3, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0501Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DARNELL M. GOINGS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-501 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, plaintiff Darnell Goings challenges the constitutionality of sex offender conditions imposed upon him by the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (hereinafter “CSOSA”), a federal agency charged with overseeing his five- year probation term. In 2010, the plaintiff was convicted, on his plea of…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API