Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1987No. 84-1383Published

1Opinion of the Court

529 A.2d 788 (1987)

Donnie R. HILL, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 84-1383.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued May 12, 1987.

Decided August 12, 1987.

Gary T. Brown, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, for appellant.

Elizabeth Trosman, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Judith Hetherton, and James F. Rutherford, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before NEBEKER, MACK and BELSON, Associate Judges.

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial of appellant's motion to reduce his sentence, or, in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Garski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sloan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Basile v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API