Legal Opinion
Gantt v. Mabus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1392PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Iben Gantt brings this action against defendant Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy, for discriminatory and retaliatory employment practices under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Now before the Court is the Secretary’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the record and for the reasons stated below, the Court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
Gantt was hired in 2003 by the Naval Research Laboratory (“NRL”) as a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Burkes v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Guerrero v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Farzam v. IsaacsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ferrell v. FudgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023