Legal Opinion
Guerrero v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-2107PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Sinceri Guerrero has worked for the U.S. Department of Agriculture since December 2010. Proceeding pro se, she sues the Secretary of the Agriculture, Tom Vil-sack, in his official capacity. Ms. Guerrero alleges that she has suffered continuous harassment, intentional discrimination, and retaliation due to her age (52) and race (Hispanic/African American) and that she has been underpaid due to such discrimination. The Secretary moves to dismiss her case in part, arguing that Ms. Guerrero has failed to exhaust some of her claims…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chien v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Abney v. Solidarity CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Chien v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Guerrero v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Jones v. BlantonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.