Biondo v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-captioned denial-of-benefits action is presently before the Court on two motions — Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Case Back to State Court and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Opposition and reply briefs have been filed by the respective parties. Having reviewed and considered the parties briefs and supporting documents, the Court has determined that oral argument is not necessary. Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Moon v. Harrison Piping SupplyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006