Legal Opinion
Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 15, 2005No. 04-CV-72316PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)
BORMAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court heard oral argument on March 10, 2005. Having considered the entire record, and for the reasons that follow, the Court:
1) DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., because they fail to state claims for which relief may be granted, and because Michigan’s Workers’…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Brown v. CassensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.