Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)
BORMAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to stay proceedings. The Court heard oral argument on February 7, 2005. Having considered the entire record, and for the reasons that follow, the Court:
1) DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., because they fail to state claims for which relief may be…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kafi, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
- Yoshikawa v. Exxon Mobil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023