Legal Opinion

Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 12, 2005No. 04-CV-71882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)

BORMAN, District Judge.

Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to stay proceedings. The Court heard oral argument on February 7, 2005. Having considered the entire record, and for the reasons that follow, the Court:

1) DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., because they fail to state claims for which relief may be…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kafi, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  2. Yoshikawa v. Exxon Mobil CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API