Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Reno

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 13, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before this Court on pro se Plaintiffs’ request for a Writ of Mandamus against Janet Reno, the Attorney General of the United States of America, Stephen Hill Jr., United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, and Edward L. Dowd, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. Plaintiffs filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus with this court on March 10, 1995. The Government moved for and was granted two extensions of time within which to respond to the Plaintiffs’ Complaint. The Government missed the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sargeant, Donald B. v. Dixon, HarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Stimac v. WIEKINGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  3. In Re Grand Jury Appearance RequestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Gage v. United States Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API