Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Appearance Request
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 29, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
851 A.2d 671 (2004)
370 N.J. Super. 406
In the Matter of the GRAND JURY APPEARANCE REQUEST by Larry S. LOIGMAN, Esq.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 4, 2004.
Re-argued June 2, 2004.
Decided June 29, 2004.
Larry S. Loigman, appellant, argued the cause pro se.
H. John Witman III, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents, the Attorney General and the twenty-one county prosecutors (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Witman, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN, COBURN and WELLS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by COBURN,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Charge to Grand JuryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1872
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by LoigmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005