Legal Opinion
Stimac v. WIEKING
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 29, 2011No. Civil Case 10-3929-KIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, District Judge:
Plaintiff Philip Stimac brings this case against Richard Wieking, the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “District Court” and the “District”); Melinda Haag and Joseph Russoniello, the current and former United States Attorneys for the District; the (unnamed) judges of the District; and the District Court. Before the court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted (# 22) and Defendants’ Motion for an Order…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nelson Morales v. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Baldwin-Kennedy v. GarretDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025