Legal Opinion

Taiheiyo Cement U.S.A., Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2012No. B226067PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

—Taiheiyo Cement U.S.A., Inc. (Taxpayer), appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted Franchise Tax Board’s (FTB) motion for judgment on the pleadings on Taxpayer’s complaint for declaratory relief and refund of taxes, interest, and penalties paid for tax years 1998 and 1999 following FTB’s disallowance of enterprise zone sales and use tax credits claimed by Taxpayer under Revenue and Taxation Code section 23612.2 for the purchase of current expense assets.1

Taxpayer contends that the trial court erred in granting FTB’s motion for judgment on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hillsboro National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dunn v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Rodas v. SpiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Natkin v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Pegastaff v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Chevron USA, Inc. v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API