Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
These consolidated cases present the question of the applicability of the tax benefit rule to two corporate tax situations: the repayment to the shareholders of taxes for which they were liable but that were originally paid by the corporation; and the distribution of expensed assets in a corporate liquidation. We conclude that, unless a nonrecognition provision of the Internal Revenue Code prevents it, the tax benefit rule ordinarily applies to require the inclusion of income when events occur that are fundamentally inconsistent with an earlier deduction. Our examination of the provisions…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woods v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Wirth v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.