Legal Opinion
Natkin v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 2013No. B241949PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
Benjamin Natkin (appellant) appeals from the denial of his petition for writ of mandate and administrative mandate filed in the superior court. Through the writ, appellant sought issuance of an order directing the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (UIAB) to vacate its decision denying him benefits for the week ending May 8, 2010, and ordering the Employment Development Department (EDD) to pay appellant benefits for the week in question. We find no error in the trial court’s decision denying the petition, therefore we affirm.
CONTENTIONS
Appellant contends that the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Kelley v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Schultz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- De Elias v. Clark CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jangozian v. Farmers Ins. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.