Continos v. Parsekian
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. Super. 54 (1961)
171 A.2d 663
CONSTANTINOS CONTINOS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NED J. PARSEKIAN, ACTING DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 13, 1961.
Decided May 24, 1961.
Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Zavesky, on the brief).
Mrs. Annamay T. Sheppard argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. William O. Barnes, Jr., attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.
Plai…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kurilla Ex Rel. Kurilla v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Collins v. YanceyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Cromwell v. NeeldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Tinsman v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maddy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Miller v. US Fidel. & Guar. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Arizona Real Estate Department v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Caballero v. MartinezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.