Legal Opinion

Sodak Distributing Company v. Wayne

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1958No. File 9660PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRentto, P.J.

The principal question posed by this litigation is whether the general rule against splitting a cause of action is to be applied when a subrogated insurer is involved.

On February 3, 1955 a truck owned by the plaintiff Distributing Company and carrying a cargo of its merchandise was involved in a collision with defendant Wayne’s veh icle. Its truck and. cargo were both damaged. Insurance covering damage to the cargo had been furnished by the Minneapolis Fire and Marine Insurance Company. On March 7,1955 the Insurance Company paid the Distributing Company for the loss to its cargo. As required…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Underwood v. . DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Matter of WilcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  4. Raschke v. DeGraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Meyer Ex Rel. Meyer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API