Legal Opinion

Avalos v. Grimale

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1939No. Civ. 10653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

—This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries and property damage caused by the collision of two automobiles. From the judgment on the verdict defendant has taken this appeal, contending that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

There was evidence to show that the collision occurred at the intersection oE Sixteenth and Valencia Streets in the city and county of San Francisco, which intersection is an obstructed highway within the meaning of the California Vehicle Act. There were no arterial stop signs on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Page v. MazzeiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Briggs v. KoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callaghy v. MosleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Huffines v. Standard Brands of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API