Legal Opinion
Yurtis v. Phipps
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 1, 2008No. 23940-3-IIIPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Jane Yurtis appeals a Pend Oreille County Superior Court order granting Harve Phipps’s motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions. Mr. Phipps seeks an award of attorney fees and costs as well as sanctions against Ms. Yurtis. In addition, Mr. Phipps asks this court to enter an order preventing Ms. Yurtis from filing any further lawsuits against him.
Kulik, J.
¶2 Since 1997, this court and the Supreme Court have reviewed Ms. Yurtis’s appeals on numerous occasions. An individual does not have an absolute and unlimited constitutional right of access to the judicial system. Ms. Yurtis’s claims…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Bay v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Holiday v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Holiday v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.