Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 21, 2009No. 27251-6-IIIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 Clark and Barbara Kinney appeal the summary dismissal of their August 1, 2007 suit alleging contract and Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) violations against Kenneth Cook. The Kinneys contend the trial court erred in deciding their breach of stock-pledge agreement claims were time barred. Because the Kinneys allege a January 2000 contract breach, under the six-year statute of limitations for contract claims, their claim is time barred. We reject the Kinneys’ attempt to extend the discovery rule to these facts and affirm. 1000 Va. Ltd. P’ship v. Vertecs Corp., 158 Wn.2d 566, 575-78, 146 P.3d…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schreiner Farms, Inc. v. American Tower, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Ensley v. MollmannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Holiday v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Holiday v. City of Moses LakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Rothwell v. Nine Mile Falls School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API