Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Boiven

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1967No. Civ. No. 8053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

While there are two codefendants, Lawrence Boiven and W. J. Boiven, the latter’s liability is derivative only and by reason thereof reference will be made only to the primary defendant in considering the appeal.

Shortly before midnight plaintiff finished her shift as a waitress and accompanied by a fellow-worker, Martha, visited the Flamingo night club on Los Angeles Street, in Anaheim, California, for the purpose of viewing a dance contest known as the “twist.” The two ladies remained at the club until 1-1:30 a.m., during which time Martha enjoyed some mixed drinks. During the course of the…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API