Pittman v. Boiven
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
While there are two codefendants, Lawrence Boiven and W. J. Boiven, the latter’s liability is derivative only and by reason thereof reference will be made only to the primary defendant in considering the appeal.
Shortly before midnight plaintiff finished her shift as a waitress and accompanied by a fellow-worker, Martha, visited the Flamingo night club on Los Angeles Street, in Anaheim, California, for the purpose of viewing a dance contest known as the “twist.” The two ladies remained at the club until 1-1:30 a.m., during which time Martha enjoyed some mixed drinks. During the course of the…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967