Legal Opinion
County of Madera v. Forrester
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1981No. Civ. 4879PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, Acting P. J.
In this case we consider alleged errors in the determination of litigation expenses and damages following an abandonment of an eminent domain action.
The County of Madera (hereinafter County) in January 1977 initiated a condemnation action (for sewage disposal purposes) with respect to certain property. A jury verdict was duly entered and judgment on the verdict was duly entered on December 2, 1978, determining that the property had a total value of $364,000. Appellant (hereinafter Forrester) was the owner of an undivided one-half interest, i.e., valued at $182,000.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Westover Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Disrict v. GoehringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Coachella Valley County Water District v. DreyfussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hancock Laboratories, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Co. And Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company, Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company, Cross-Complainant and v. Admiral Insurance Company, Cross-Defendant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.