Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. E. L. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 8, 2015No. 14334J; Petition Number 14334J01; A157786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, P. J.

Father and mother (collectively, parents) each appeal a juvenile court judgment asserting jurisdiction over their two-month old child, C, making him a ward of the court under ORS 419B.100(l)(c). On appeal, father and mother argue that the juvenile court erred in asserting jurisdiction over C because the Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to establish that father and mother’s incestuous relationship posed a current risk of serious loss or injury to C. In an additional assignment of error, mother argues that the juvenile court also erred in ordering parents to have no contact with one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. M. D. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. M. D. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. T. S. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. R. M. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API