Legal Opinion

Adams v. Aspen Water, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011No. 36501PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Matthew Adams appeals the Industrial Commission’s determination that he is not eligible for unemployment benefits because he was terminated for employment-related misconduct. We affirm.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

Matthew Adams was employed by Aspen Water, Inc., a firm that sells and services water softening systems, from September of 2007 until his termination on November 4, 2008. Adams worked as an installer and generally spent his time conducting installations, making service calls, or completing paperwork around the office. In October of 2008, Adams sustained a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Folks v. Moscow School District No. 281Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Davis v. Howard O. Miller Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Alder v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Beaty v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Pimley v. Best Values, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. Health Care ID Credit Union; Dept of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Locker v. HOW SOEL, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Talbot v. Desert View Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rigoli v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Stark v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API