Legal Opinion

Vosk v. Encompass Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Terry G. Vosk and Arno D. Yosk, ask us to review the order entered in the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas, which sustained the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by Appellee, Encompass Insurance Company, and dismissed with prejudice Appellants’ complaint alleging entitlement to stacked underinsured motorist benefits. We hold that an executed insurance form rejecting stacked underin-sured motorist benefits is not rendered void by a minor, clarifying deviation in the form’s title, where the form otherwise complies with 75 Pa.C.S.A.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. McGovern v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Youndt v. First National Bank of Port AlleganySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Burks v. Federal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Peters, M. v. National Interstate Insurance CompanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Jones v. Unitrin Auto & Home InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. American International Insurance v. VaxmonskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API