United States v. Decker
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
At the trial of this case the jury convicted both defendants for violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 338, the mail fraud statute. Both defendants have filed motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial. These motions do not present any new points in addition to those urged at the trial, but respective counsel for the defendants have argued the motions with earnestness and ability and have also filed elaborate briefs with an excellent discussion of the applicable law. I have therefore carefully considered the matter anew, as a result of which, however, I adhere to the* view…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Myers v. Moore-Kile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Tincher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dorothy Jane Simpson v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Mohr v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- United States v. Priscilla R. Scott, United States of America v. Stephen Rodger WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Decker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Aulen v. Triumph Explosive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.