Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1958No. [No. 148, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornet, J.

Carl H. Mohr (Mohr) in an action against Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation (C.I.T.), in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Oppenheimer, J.) sought a declaratory decree providing that a conditional contract of sale of an automobile, purportedly executed by Mohr to Suburban Nash, Inc., (Suburban), a dealer in automobiles, and assigned by Suburban to C.I.T. was null and void because the signature thereon was a forgery. C.I.T. denied that Mohr’s signature was forged, and claimed that even if it were, he was estopped to deny the validity of the lien 1 created by the conditional contract of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Continental National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Biggs v. StuelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Kolker v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Gould v. Transamerican AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API