Legal Opinion

Aulen v. Triumph Explosive, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 5, 1944No. 2173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This is a private civil nonjury suit by two individual employes of Triumph Explosives, Inc., a Maryland corporation, to recover further compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207, for hours of work in excess of forty hours a week. All the testimony has been taken in court and the case argued by counsel and submitted for decision. The principal defense is that the employes were employed in a professional capacity and therefore are not within the provisions of the Act, which, in section 213, reads in part: “(a) The provisions of sections 206 and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Sun Pub. Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arasimowicz v. All Panel Systems, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
  2. McComb v. TurpinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  3. Hodgson v. MauldinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1972
  4. Harrison v. Preston Trucking Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  5. Hofer v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API