Legal Opinion
Tincher v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1926No. 2371PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The first point urged upon us by defendants relates to the sufficiency of the indictment. As we understand their contention, it is that the counts of the indictment are defective in that they do not allege that the fraudulent scheme charged was intended to be effected by the use of the mails, and in that it does not appear from the indictment how the use of the mails alleged would have been effective in furthering the fraud. As to the first proposition, the answer is that this was not a prosecution for conspiracy under section 37 of the Penal Code (Comp. St.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Farmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.