Legal Opinion

United States v. Rojas

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 12, 1987No. CR-87-00002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SIFTON, District Judge.

Defendants, Alvaro Rojas, Amado Cardo-na and Frank Parra, have been indicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and for conspiracy to do the same in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The charges arise from defendants’ arrest on December 17, 1986, at which time 60 kilograms of cocaine were seized. All three defendants have moved on various grounds to suppress tangible evidence and statements obtained from them at the time of and subsequent to their arrest. In addition, defendant Parra moves…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BurnsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. TaftDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  3. United States v. Sik Sze YanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. United States v. SanchezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API